X-UIDL: 4117 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from mail.2rosenthals.com (localhost [127.0.0.1] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:22:12 -0500 Received: from mail1.no-ip.com (goodyear.vitalwerks.com [63.210.163.179] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:22:10 -0500 X-Envelope-To: Received: (qmail 24733 invoked by uid 89); 5 Mar 2003 02:22:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAIL03.toast.net) (206.244.185.10) by mail1.no-ip.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2003 02:22:04 -0000 Received: from 2rosenthals.com (unverified [206.149.148.154]) by MAIL03.toast.net (Vircom SMTPRS 2.0.241) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:21:11 -0500 Message-ID: <3E655F45.7070509@2rosenthals.com> Organization: Rosenthal & Rosenthal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.3b; MultiZilla v1.3.1 (a)) Gecko/20030211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200303042052.h24Kqg6A019300@asv6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <200303041954.4657501.6@mail1.bbfprinting.com> <200303041800.000004FC@dsl3-63-249-70-32.cruzio.com> In-Reply-To: <200303041800.000004FC@dsl3-63-249-70-32.cruzio.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:22:11 est5edt X-OldDate: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 21:21:57 -0500 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Lewis G Rosenthal To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: OS/2 Wireless Users List: Devi ce driver development X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Obviously, you have a point, Neil. I still think that it shouldn't take that much work to design & implement the driver, given a modicum of support form the hardware manufacturer (naturally, if one were forced to disassemble and reverse-engineer the thing, then the clock starts spinning, but this is neither desirable nor legal - usually). What I think we all find annoying is that while we all agree that an extra $100 or so for a card is an acceptable premium to pay the manufacturer for providing a compatible card & driver set, and while manufacturers could probably find 400-600 sales in the OS/2-eCS community as it stands today, they don't make the effort, so we have to seek alternatives. :-\ Neil Waldhauer wrote: >Well, I think the price is neither unfair, nor unaffordable for the right >customer. It does show why we as users cannot get software for our favorite >platform, but I'm getting that you can't imagine a world where we get drivers >like this just because they only cost $40-60K. > >Look at the Artem-based cards from Mensys. You get a good 802.11b card for >about $150, which Windows users could get a similar quality card for $50. The >extra $100 is amortization for the $40-60K driver cost. Work it out -- that is >400 to 600 cards. > >Neil > > > -- Lewis --------------------------------------------------------------------- Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal : Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia : www.2rosenthals.com Novell Users International : www.whytheylie.com OS/2's new face is eComStation : www.ecomstation.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 01:08 hours and 11 seconds =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=