X-UIDL: 4116 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from mail.2rosenthals.com (localhost [127.0.0.1] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:12:43 -0500 Received: from mail1.no-ip.com (goodyear.vitalwerks.com [63.210.163.179] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:12:41 -0500 X-Envelope-To: Received: (qmail 19078 invoked by uid 89); 5 Mar 2003 02:12:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAIL03.toast.net) (206.244.185.10) by mail1.no-ip.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2003 02:12:37 -0000 Received: from 2rosenthals.com (unverified [206.149.148.154]) by MAIL03.toast.net (Vircom SMTPRS 2.0.241) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:11:45 -0500 Message-ID: <3E655D13.8050306@2rosenthals.com> Organization: Rosenthal & Rosenthal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.3b; MultiZilla v1.3.1 (a)) Gecko/20030211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200303042106.1260491.6@mail.2rosenthals.com> In-Reply-To: <200303042106.1260491.6@mail.2rosenthals.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:12:42 est5edt X-OldDate: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 21:12:35 -0500 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Lewis G Rosenthal To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: OS/2 Wireless Users List: Intel power saving technology X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com True, but frankly, I don't notice much difference in range with the 350 over the 340. What I do see is a marked difference between either Cisco and a LinkSys. Wow! All that aside, power management could use some optimization in all of these, but we're really only in the infancy of wireless mobile cards, anyway. Aron Eisenpress wrote: >On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:57:29 est5edt Lewis G Rosenthal said: > > >>Ever notice how your wireless NIC sucks down the juice? I've found it >>particular;ly interesting to note that my Cisco 350 drains my battery >>faster than when I swap in my wife's 340. Her ThinkPad A22m runs for >>well over an hour and a half with the 340, while I'm lucky to get much >>over an hour (1:10?) with my T20 running the 350. >> >> > > >Ah, but the Cisco 350 has a higher radio output than the 340... >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to >steward@2rosenthals.com with the command >"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body >(omit the quotes). > >For help with other commands, send a message >to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command >"help" in the body (omit the quotes). > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > > > > -- Lewis --------------------------------------------------------------------- Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal : Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia : www.2rosenthals.com Novell Users International : www.whytheylie.com OS/2's new face is eComStation : www.ecomstation.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 01:04 hours and 43 seconds =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=