From: "Neil Waldhauer" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2550745 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:44:04 -0400 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1MI0rT-0004sM-Gp for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:44:03 -0400 Received: from host1.cruzio.com ([63.249.95.131]:59219) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MI0rR-0004L5-2H for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:44:02 -0400 Received: (qmail 26024 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2009 06:43:59 -0700 Received: from dsl-63-249-111-252.dhcp.cruzio.com (HELO 192.168.46.81) (63.249.111.252) by dreamersdeck.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2009 06:43:59 -0700 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010205.4A3CE7A1.027D,ss=1,fgs=0 Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:43:50 -0700 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Very basic wireless question MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25d; build=2006 X-Mailer-Platform: OS/2; architecture=x86; version=20.45 X-Mailer-Java-VM: IBM Corporation; version=J2RE 1.3.1 IBM build co131-20060605 (SR10) (JIT enabled: jitc); compiler=jitc Message-ID: On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:49:25 -0700, "Mark Henigan" wrote: > I'm attempting to select a T43p You know, a T43 would be quite a bit quicker than a T43p, at least for graphics, under OS/2. Make sure you get the X300 graphics, not the Intel 900. But even the Intel 900 would be faster than the 43p, which is completely unaccelerated. Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil@blondeguy.com Laughter is the sun that drives winter from the human face.