X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 139087 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 5.1.3 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: List-Archive: Precedence: list Message-ID: Reply-To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Sender: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" X-Original-Message-ID: <4751FBA4.8000708@2rosenthals.com> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:26:12 -0500 From: "Lewis G Rosenthal" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Xbox 802.11b/g (2.4GHz) interference (was: Re: [OS2Wireless] First large-scale 802.11n wireless LAN...) On 11/30/07 10:23 am, Leon D. Zetekoff thus wrote : > * Lewis G Rosenthal wrote, On 11/29/2007 9:01 PM: >> On 11/29/07 05:32 pm, Leon D. Zetekoff thus wrote : >>> * Lewis G Rosenthal wrote, On 11/29/2007 3:14 PM: >>> >> >>>> Leon, your point about using subchannels is moot when discussing >>>> client connections to an AP. Between carrier grade AP's, yes, but >>>> I've never seen a client with the ability to use subchannels (and >>>> that's not part of the 802.11b or g specs, AFAIK). >>> let's rephrase that subchannels are not in consumer off-shelf >>> equipment. We use APs and clients all the time with subchannels. >>> it does seem MS has some issues they need to address but for the >>> most part noise in the 2.4 band is not going to go away but get >>> worse so getting away from the consumer grade equipment will help >>> the situation a little as well as give you more channels to work with. >>> >> How do you get away from consumer grade equipment when Intel 3945AGN >> adapters (et. seq.) *are* consumer grade? I agree that the >> interference isn't going away; I think the answer on the client side >> is attenuation, either by cleverly designed reflectors/deflectors, >> supplementary antennae, or by some type of discreet software >> filtering. That said, I'm *not* a radio guy, so perhaps someone with >> more HAM experience may want to chime in here. >> > has nothing to do with ham or not...it depends on the firmware running > on those interfaces as well. The ubiquiti (and others) radio cards do > support subchannels and the OS being used does as well. Noise is noise > whether it is from a wideband signal over a narrower signal but when > you do move to a subchannel, it is like putting a filter in place; not > totally but pretty much close to it. > Please explain how to select a subchannel in XWLAN running a device controlled by GenMAC, or how to acomplish the same with a LinkSys WRT54G router using either factory firmware or DD-WRT. I'm all ears... My statement about HAM radio is related to noise filtering. I would guess that people with more radio experience than I might have more to say insofar as filtering is concerned, that's all. -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com eComStation Consultants www.ecomstation.com Novell Users Int'l www.novell.com/openenterpriseserver Need a managed Wi-Fi hotspot? www.hautspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email. Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=