From: "Mark Henigan" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2552050 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:48:07 -0400 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1MITxM-00028a-JG for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:48:07 -0400 Received: from smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.88]:43113) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MITxK-0002Ai-1B for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:48:02 -0400 Received: (qmail 6798 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2009 20:41:20 -0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010206.4A3E9C82.018A,ss=1,fgs=0 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=T41xXdW0zDjRmMWHS9RjbZfztHsSozJlH3ZnWNJCHV2vF25ChJ68QOnOBtdivTfDTpHvtFDlE+Oh/uPd4AL/F/yfeGK7odOKmrqhefPOzOnC1S7Zt1z11zOkvmtq88H51DeqEBr+uRfR8BH4354/m/npdKq5kzdaoJqqkSYYc38= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?69.110.74.86?) (driven_zen@69.110.74.86 with plain) by smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2009 20:41:20 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 0WaQzHMVM1kmYpSyu4DNt82Atd3rf.438Ex_OtGcO01NARnjdlDrQGiCRH1UXmATXbS10q4.TEOG89UxjGaHD_4QRfoUCtxwIO6B_o0xGlg451eiTgtb68inrUYl2FkHcSf6HXr4ktCBFeDnfhQqofeg4_xLAzavv1YO4y8dNYvcE3Rkx.3T78O9iuWgAMU.A7Bff75iQT0_UbUE103Gp2MgrvgvQnZ2iVeiJ_P6fQSBG4mXTanuVeG7V4.tZvSCaAbGagwHku_4OjahXGn_aS8pqKdRlq41d7kbdyH0LLNciHHHMsnPP83YwwAs7eoJm1Ccb_in6rEG_EKb3XnzlEVCytqXc3f.E5OQqTiD7lu1HklbekfgbURa_Rj9 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4A3E9AF0.2010403@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:41:20 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, cs MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: Very basic wireless question References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote: > * Lewis G Rosenthal wrote, On 6/20/2009 9:11 AM: > >> On 06/19/09 09:25 pm, Mark Henigan thus wrote : >> >>> Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:49:25 -0700 "Mark Henigan" >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> 802.11a is another matter. This uses a different frequency >>>> altogether, in the 5GHz band, and as such utilizes a completely >>>> separate radio. >>> >>> >>> >>> So, it's even more inconsistent than I feared! How >>> often will I be likely to run into each of these >>> standards? If 802.11a is quite rare I may ignore it. >>> >> These days, 802.11a is surely not very popular. > > WiSP backhauls utilize 5 gHz unlicensed. There are a bunch of vendors > that make a 2.4/5ghz radio card. I have a D-link for one and there are > others as well as an FYI. > > I don't think you'll see much end-user 5 gHz stuff, that's my personal > opinion. Hello Leon: What is a WiSP backhaul? I'm curious. - Mark Mark Henigan --