X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 130715 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: <os2-wireless_users-report@2rosenthals.com> X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 5.1.3 List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:os2-wireless_users-off@2rosenthals.com> List-ID: <os2-wireless_users.2rosenthals.com> List-Archive: <http://2rosenthals.com:8100/Lists/os2-wireless_users/List.html> Precedence: list Message-ID: <list-1424722@2rosenthals.com> Reply-To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> Sender: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> X-Original-Message-ID: <471E0937.7050501@2rosenthals.com> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:46:15 -0400 From: "Lewis G Rosenthal" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] 802.11n hardware? On 10/23/07 10:38 am, Ed Durrant thus wrote : > > > Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >> I'm thinking of investing in an 802.11n (draft spec) router, mainly >> for testing the new GenMAC support for the Intel 4965AGN card. Is >> anybody using any 802.11n equipment currently (under any OS), and if >> so, are there any recommendations? I'm leaning toward the LinkSys >> WRT150N, but not for any particular reason other than the fact that >> I'm probably more familiar with their firmware on other devices than >> anyone else's. >> >> TIA >> >> PS - I'd love to cover some of the available 802.11n stuff at >> Warpstock this year; not that I'm necessarily advocating that >> everyone jump on the draft spec bandwagon and invest in hardware >> which may not be compliant in another year. ;-) > > I'd advise against going to 802.11N as (I believe) this is still a > non-ratified draft standard still. From what I have heard - on any OS, > you should use the same manufacturer for the clients NIC and the > access point/router if you want it to work at the highest speeds. > Given that you're using an Intel NIC, I'm not sure if Intel produce an > access point and if they don't if they produce a chipset for others to > use in their Access Points. I heard good things about both Linksys and > D-Link but in both cases using the same make for the NIC and the > router. In fact I believe these are often bundled for exactly this > reason. > Hi, Ed, and sorry for the delay in getting your posts to the list. Yes, if it weren't for GenMAC testing purposes, I would steer clear of 802.11n until the standard is ratified. However, it's hard to be able to say that a driver works without being able to test all of its capabilities. I don't know if Intel makes routers, either. I guess I should do some net stumbling to see what the success stories have been with the Intel card before making a purchase, even for testing. -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com eComStation Consultants www.ecomstation.com Novell Users Int'l www.novell.com/openenterpriseserver Need a managed Wi-Fi hotspot? www.hautspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <os2-wireless_users-off@2rosenthals.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <os2-wireless_users-digest@2rosenthals.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <os2-wireless_users-index@2rosenthals.com> Send administrative queries to <os2-wireless_users-request@2rosenthals.com> To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: <os2-wireless_users-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to the confirmation email. Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=