Message #570 des archives de la Liste os2-wireless

Message #570 des archives de la Liste os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com

De:	"Lewis G Rosenthal" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>	En-têtes complèts Message brut
Sujet:	Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: David Pogue wakes up about WIFI encryption
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:25:29 -0500
À:	OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>

On 01/11/07 11:36 am, Doug LaRue thus wrote : ** Reply to message from "Carl Gehr" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> on Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:37:02 -0500 (EST) Here's a very timely article on this topic. It should generate some interesting discussion... Carl On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:23:27 -0500, Computerworld First Look wrote: * Wi-Fi concerns prompt new security laws http://cwflyris.computerworld.com/t/1179890/44248198/46688/2/ Once again the laws miss the mark since what is needed to be protected is consumers/customer data and information. We need laws to start protecting OUR data from careless corporate security practices and enable monetary damage rewards for those harmed. Only then will businesses start thinking more about what is the right thing to do instead of just doing what ´everyone else is doing´. Forcing EVERYONE to close their wireless network sounds more like the laws were promoted by the cable and ISDN networks or just plain ignorance at the law making level. Doug, I finally took the time to *read* this article (though I have not as yet read the laws discussed). Your point is well-taken. I got a distinct chuckle out of the mention that the equipment manufacturers be required to provide warning stickers about Wi-Fi security. This is like Smith & Wesson providing a sticker which says that guns can be used as lethal weapons (I'm an NRA member). The fact that the Westchester County IT department is war driving is another hoot. Talk about taxpayer dollars (not) at work... Again, much of this comes down to the mistaken impression that consumers have a right of privacy. There's no such mention in the Constitution; we are all the gatekeepers of our own privacy. Security-lax businesses should indeed be held to account in civil court, and should it be proven that the individual (the plaintiff in such cases, one would assume) was negligent in using http vs https, for example, the case should be thrown out. I can use the electrical current in my house to jolt my neighbor, but I wouldn't expect the Long Island Power Authority to drive by and make sure that I didn;t have any extension cords in my garage long enough to reach across my proprty line. :-) <snip> "Excuse me: Can you tell me the IP address of this cable?" - Actual question from a MCSE! Priceless... -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com eComStation Consultants www.ecomstation.com Novell Users Int'l www.novell.com/openenterpriseserver Need a managed Wi-Fi hotspot? www.hautspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------

Abonner: Direct, Résumé, Index.
Désabonner
Écrire au gestionnaire de la liste