X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 111629 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 5.1.3 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: List-Archive: Precedence: list Message-ID: Reply-To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Sender: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" From: "Stanley Sidlov" Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:06:22 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Beaconing vs Non - connection issues (was: Re: [OS2Wireless] First experience with Vista and Wi-Fi - OT) On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:37:27 +1000, Ed Durrant wrote: >Under Windoze XP, Micro$oft did bring out a WiFi improvement patches >pack, which was also includes in SP2 so I suspect Lewis >may have hit the reason why you are seeing differences under apparently >similar systems, are they at different patch levels ? As mentioned in the links to documents that I posted in my earlier reply, the driver levels of the wireless devices are partly an issue. Take my WPC54GS card in the laptop. I was at a friend's home whose network I set up. Scanning doesn't show the network since it doesn't beacon. I manually configured it under Windows since the scan and select doesn't show anything, and it worked. A day later, MS Update tells me they have a newer driver for the hardware, I update it and it doesn't work any longer until the Beaconing is turned back on, it connects but doesn't aquire an IP address. MS thinks this is progress. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email. Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=