From: "Will Honea" Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 767151 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:34:01 -0500 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HBdpc-0000DX-Dy for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:14:31 -0500 Received: from smtp107.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.200.255]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HBdpX-000IlC-6V for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:14:23 -0500 Received: (qmail 65760 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2007 21:14:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.100.7) (whonea@whonea.net@70.59.203.124 with login) by smtp107.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2007 21:14:11 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: V2FAi5cVM1nMLLKZUsiRRmXlQKoLGsKvmVCniXjjcLEgpMwTDLH0AFIZirBVhWr_aLsy.RVAbQP2FuEG_k1XFb8tIUFr7_ZFmTGzT7ADIxP0M3oqNZMEpXRC2U9VGV4mz5IC1SrrntY_423Bg0ya1ytuW_YW3ADIBQA- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:14:07 -0700 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Will Honea" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Possible sluggishness due to Verizon DSL issues MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25d; build=2006 X-Mailer-Platform: Linux; architecture=i386; version=2.6.18.2-34-default X-Mailer-Java-VM: Sun Microsystems Inc.; version=1.5.0_10; compiler=null X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 68.142.200.255 X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Message-ID: Something funny is going on - I've been fighting the same problem with at least two other sites I maintain for the last week. One turned out to be an open SMTP forwarder on the server spewing SPAM and chewing up the bandwidth, the other is ongoing with a different provider. ** Reply to message from "Lewis G Rosenthal" on Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:15:58 -0500 > (N.B.: I am sending this posting to hosted mailing lists as this issue > may impact list messages as well. I will subscribe all hosted lists to > the mailusers list for future notices.) > > Beginning Saturday, January 27, we started seeing some > unusual performance issues with the primary DSL connection > here on the network. This condition manifested itself as > erratic bandwidth (perceived as "speed" by end users) > while sending mail through our server, fetching mail from > it, or connecting through IMAP or webmail. In addition, > websites and ftp repositories hosted here were similarly > affected. > > As the condition continued into Sunday, I performed some > standard troubleshooting which culminated in my opening a > trouble ticket with Verizon. (According to their system > status log, there was a ticket opened and "resolved" on > Friday in our immediate vicinity; it is entirely possible > that this "resolution" is the cause of our current > trouble.) We are currently rolled over to our backup > interface which, though reliable, is somewhat > bandwidth-constrained. This constraint may appear to the > end user as slow response from our servers, but should not > result in timeout conditions as several people were > observing with the primary interface. > > As soon as Verizon has resolved the issue(s) to my > satisfaction, I will return connectivity to the primary > interface, and performance should return to expected > levels. > > To help alleviate any possible saturation of the available > bandwidth here, I would kindly ask for your patience when > checking for mail, and request that you exercise restraint > in not immediately re-trying for mail while operations may > already be in progress at your end of the link. Such > repeated attempts to fetch mail serve only to further bog > the network and make things more difficult for everyone. > > My apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused, > and for any additional delays while this trouble ticket > remains open. > -- Will Honea