From: "Doug LaRue" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2831304 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:37:05 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1MfmqC-0001z8-Pm for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:37:05 -0400 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121]:64995) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mfmq0-0001Qo-2H for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:36:48 -0400 Received: from voyager2.lan ([75.80.160.171]) by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20090825010138155.OJHK6799@cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com> for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:01:38 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.4A935C50.022C,ss=1,fgs=0 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:01:37 -0700 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Doug LaRue" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: Is there such a device? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25a; build=1965 Message-Id: <20090825010138155.OJHK6799@cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ ** Reply to message from "Ed Durrant" on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:02:08 +1000 > While the WRT54G as a basic network device works fine with OS/2 (I have > been using one as my main router here for many years), my question was > related to an OS/2 VPN client - from what Lewis says the VPN support in > the WRT54G (even flashed with the DD-WRT firmware) does not have an OS/2 > compatible client that is able to access the system from another > location via the Internet. I couldn't dig up the previous comments regarding openvpn on OS/2 or eCS but I did google for it and found a statement which said that openvpn was ported to OS/2. As Hobbes list it, it's 3 years old but here's the link: http://hobbes.nmsu.edu/h-search.php?key=openvpn&pushbutton=Search maybe what was said regarded backward compatibility. Doug