From: "Lewis G Rosenthal" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (account lgrosenthal HELO [192.168.100.23]) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 2847385 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:48:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4AA00F71.6090105@2rosenthals.com> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:48:17 -0400 Organization: Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090704 MultiZilla/1.8.3.5g SeaMonkey/1.1.17 (PmW) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: WPA2 with IEEE 802.1X References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Julian... On 09/01/09 10:08 pm, Julian Thomas thus wrote : > On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:21:06 -0400 Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > >> Ah, PEAP. See our earlier discussion of LEAP, and in particular, >> Christian's comments in his response. You may be able to accomplish this >> > >from a command line, but it may not be included in the build of the > >> WPA_Supplicant we have. >> >>> Am I constrained to live on the darkside when I want to connect to this network? >>> >>> >> Possibly, for the short to medium term. Have a look at >> http://hostap.epitest.fi/wpa_supplicant/ et seq, particularly the sample >> conf. Again, our build is based upon version 0.5.7 of the supplicant; >> the current version is 0.6.9; it's possible that PEAP support was not >> functional at the time of the port. >> >> Good luck, and please report your findings! >> > > Sigh. Doesn't sound simple. For openers, I still need to get it working under XP (when I tried to register, I found > myself at a website with a lot of complex instructions, oriented towards having Windows manage the connection. > I *think* I was able to map them into what I have to do with Access Connections on the thinkpad, but need to get > back there to try it out. > > Yes, indeed, Access Connections *should* be able to handle PEAP. > Plus, for good measure, my Linux partition (Centos) won't even work with the wireless, so that's not an option until > I can find a way to get that fixed... :-( > That's a surprise. I thought that CentOS had pretty much full support for most modern Wi-Fi cards, even if using the Mad-Fi driver. CentOS 4 or 5 (not wanting to stray too far OT...)? -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------- Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC www.2rosenthals.com Need a managed Wi-Fi hotspot? www.hautspot.com Secure, stable, operating system www.ecomstation.com -------------------------------------------------------------