From: "Ray Davison" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2994986 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:44:13 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt1Le-0003OC-SU for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:44:13 -0400 Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82]:64872) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mt1Lb-0000It-13 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:44:07 -0400 Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090930154406.NWPU3051.mta31.charter.net@imp09> for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:44:06 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([71.9.78.218]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id n3k51c00P4icEEX053k6vl; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:44:06 -0400 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020206.4AC37CC7.0191,ss=2,fgs=0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=HsN1iwfeFsYA:10 a=3QOYw2DFicASKxhYWh0A:9 a=UHYK5myARWoEDhw53uNnrrZGF3QA:4 Message-ID: <4AC37CC5.4050307@charter.net> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:44:05 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090827 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 (PmW) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: Wireless extension to LAN References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > The "Peacock" thread (not announcement) is here: > I'll look at that later today. > > I think my statement missed a word in the first sentence, which should > have read, "This refers to the latest firmware revision." I might have > been over-generalizing, though, as that thread is quite good all around. > AFAIK, 2.3 SP2 should work fine (at least standard; I don't recall > whether I've ever done it under mini). The instructions I followed said install mini first and then std. >>> > Please give me some details as to IP addresses in each router, whether > DHCP service is enabled on each one (should be *only* on the GS, unless > you are getting DHCP from somewhere else or using static IP), and what > your default gateway is on a connected client (should be the IP address > of your GS). > You mistake me for someone who knows what he is doing. Up to this point a router was something I just plugged in and ignored, except for watching the lights. When I got a wireless laptop and router I eventually turned on security. DHCP was just something I selected when installing an OS. I have encountered references to DHCP in at least a couple places in these routers, but have avoided altering what I did not understand. Ray