From: "Will Honea" Received: from mxout1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.165] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 773840 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:09:30 -0500 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HCNdp-0009Vs-MH for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:09:25 -0500 Received: from smtp107.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.52.176]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HCNdp-000MGn-AC for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:09:21 -0500 Received: (qmail 25964 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2007 22:09:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.100.7) (whonea@whonea.net@70.59.203.124 with login) by smtp107.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2007 22:09:10 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: jv7JGpYVM1lM8Kpf3ckfY_ZsvkH8stO_AaV.bYi55.4oynuGUR3rZt48U24ybH_ew3d.x0rJwbtb.CwxGQnf0SfUqbMQlBgaMil.RPK4AJhfr1jsyHTTEQq3LeC34VTJDhnEfn.MZ46Weg-- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:09:10 -0700 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Will Honea" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Network status update MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25d; build=2006 X-Mailer-Platform: Linux; architecture=i386; version=2.6.18.2-34-default X-Mailer-Java-VM: Sun Microsystems Inc.; version=1.5.0_10; compiler=null X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 206.190.52.176 X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) Message-ID: ** Reply to message from "Lewis G Rosenthal" on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:39 -0500 Lew, I fought this exact problem with Qwest a year or so back: strong signal at the box, marginal to no signal at the modem. The DSL modem I have has built-in signal analysis and it would go from a downstream SNR of 2 up to 16-20 in a matter of minutes. Upstream SNR was consistently in the 28-32 range. They showed up and measured a DOWN/UP SNR of 18/30 at the service entry point so I plugged in my modem with nothing else attached and got a barely usable 6/30 reading. AHA! Bad modem. Now, by a quirk in Qwest's shipping, I wound up with 3 of these modems so I swapped in a new one - 8/30. Swapped in the third one and got 10/30, so I left it in. For the next two months, that modem ran with anywhere from 6/25 to 12/30 SNR. One day, up popped a SNR of 18/30 and the downstream attenuation remain above 15 ever after. Swapped to original "bad" modem back in and what do you know - 17/30! I pulled the logs for all this time and made a rather interesting discovery: the bad signals exactly tracked the gateway machine I was assigned. I called a friend at Qwest and he checked their records - they had swapped equipment on that server for weak signal just after all my problems. Looks like the problem was fairly far upstream from me after all. > The Verizon service personnel just left. After several tests, it appears > that the primary connection is functioning normally once again. However, > there are some additional steps which I will be taking in the coming > days to improve performance of both lines, though the signal loss from > the Verizon termination at the house (the "demarc) is minimal. Verizon > has closed this ticket. > > I will continue to monitor the behavior of the line for the next few > days. In the meantime, and as per usual, please report to my email > address any delays or broken connections which you may experience. > > Thanks again for everyone's patience. Hopefully, this matter is now in > the past. -- Will Honea