On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:28:28 -0400 Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
>My point was that *some* people *sometime* are *bound* to post in HTML,
>either by accident or simply as a result of the default in those
>particular clients to be HTML.
>
As I started this let me be clear. I was not moaning about HTML mail
itself in this instance, although it is one of my pet peeves, but the
fact that the stupid mailer put "this is HTML and your mailer can't
read it" or similar in the plain text portion *instead* of a text
version of the message. :-(