From: "Lewis G Rosenthal" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (account lgrosenthal HELO [192.168.100.28]) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 1850704 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:56:38 -0400 Message-ID: <4AD67346.6090804@2rosenthals.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:56:38 -0400 Organization: Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090827 MultiZilla/1.8.3.5g SeaMonkey/1.1.18 (PmW) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: A bit Off Topic: Which WAP to go for? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/14/09 07:04 pm, Julian Thomas thus wrote : > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:10:34 -0700 Ray Davison wrote: > >> >>> I thought I saw where N was ratified a couple of weeks back. Did I mis-read >>> and take the final draft announcement for the final act? >>> >> True. >> >> http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/80211N-Officially-Ratified-104443 >> > > Indeed, per my forward to the list on 18 September: http://mail.2rosenthals.com:8100/Lists/os2-wireless_users/Message/6239.html > So how much of the N gear on the market is in full compliance with the final standard? > Hardly any just yet, which was really the point I was trying to make. What I *should* have said was that N was just *recently* ratified, and it is probably wise to wait a little while to be able to procure equipment which is fully compliant. Mea culpa. ;-) -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------- Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC www.2rosenthals.com Need a managed Wi-Fi hotspot? www.hautspot.com Secure, stable, operating system www.ecomstation.com -------------------------------------------------------------