From: "Will Honea" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 1850724 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:59:04 -0400 Received-SPF: pass (secmgr-ny.randr: domain of eigbox.net designates 66.96.186.12 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.96.186.12; envelope-from=SRS0=yWeEZn=GE=whonea.net=whonea@eigbox.net; helo=bosmailout12.eigbox.net; Received: from bosmailout12.eigbox.net ([66.96.186.12]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MyEgI-0000nT-1E for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:59:03 -0400 Received: from bosmailscan13.eigbox.net ([10.20.15.13]) by bosmailout12.eigbox.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1MyEgG-0005ea-B1 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:59:00 -0400 Received: from bosimpout01.eigbox.net ([10.20.55.1]) by bosmailscan13.eigbox.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1MyEgG-00042X-6q for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:59:00 -0400 Received: from bosauthsmtp16.eigbox.net ([10.20.18.16]) by bosimpout01.eigbox.net with NO UCE id soyp1c0040LoEWa0000000; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:58:49 -0400 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.20.18.16 X-EN-IMPSID: soyp1c0040LoEWa0000000 Received: from 97-112-159-162.clsp.qwest.net ([97.112.159.162] helo=main) by bosauthsmtp16.eigbox.net with esmtpa (Exim) id 1MyEg4-0008U7-RE for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:58:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:58:46 -0600 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Will Honea" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: A bit Off Topic: Which WAP to go for? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25d; build=2006 X-Mailer-Platform: Linux; architecture=amd64; version=2.6.27.29-0.1-default X-Mailer-Java-VM: Sun Microsystems Inc.; version=1.6.0_15; compiler=null X-EN-UserInfo: b0192109012588bf2b05ebe482b26736:f259605ce5aa1fb891467026511a1cfb X-EN-AuthUser: whonea@whonea.net Sender: "Will Honea" X-EN-OrigIP: 97.112.159.162 X-EN-OrigHost: 97-112-159-162.clsp.qwest.net X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Message-ID: ** Reply to message from "Julian Thomas" on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:04:49 -0400 (EDT) > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:10:34 -0700 Ray Davison wrote: > > > > > >> I thought I saw where N was ratified a couple of weeks back. Did I mis-read > >> and take the final draft announcement for the final act? > > > >True. > > > >http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/80211N-Officially-Ratified-104443 > > So how much of the N gear on the market is in full compliance with the final standard? Can't say in general, but Sam's had a deal last week on a Linksys model that advertised full N compliance last week. Almost bought it but I need a DSL modem as well in order to use it - and my wireless devices are all B/G, with a couple adding A to the list so N is of only academic interest to me right now. The Linksys deal was at a pretty good price, BTW. -- Will Honea