| From: |
"Will Honea" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> |
Full Headers
Undecoded message |
| Sender: |
"Will Honea" <whonea@whonea.net> |
| Subject: |
Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: A bit Off Topic: Which WAP to go for? |
| Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:58:46 -0600 |
| To: |
"OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> |
|
|---|
** Reply to message from "Julian Thomas" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:10:34 -0700 Ray Davison wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I thought I saw where N was ratified a couple of weeks back. Did I mis-read
> >> and take the final draft announcement for the final act?
> >
> >True.
> >
> >http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/80211N-Officially-Ratified-104443
>
> So how much of the N gear on the market is in full compliance with the final standard?
Can't say in general, but Sam's had a deal last week on a Linksys model that
advertised full N compliance last week. Almost bought it but I need a DSL
modem as well in order to use it - and my wireless devices are all B/G, with a
couple adding A to the list so N is of only academic interest to me right now.
The Linksys deal was at a pretty good price, BTW.
--
Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net>
|