From: "Dave Saville" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 1868915 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:55:14 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1N34JC-0003gS-Lr for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:55:14 -0400 Received: from mail.deezee.org.uk ([81.187.184.98]:58668) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N34J5-0005Ip-2M for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:55:04 -0400 Received: from bearpaw.bear.den (bearpaw.bear.den [192.168.0.201]) by mail.deezee.org.uk (Weasel v1.80) for ; 28 Oct 2009 08:54:58 +0100 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.4AE806E8.003C,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <000.786301002d06e84a.003@deezee.org> To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:51:57 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: References: Priority: Normal User-Agent: PMMail/3.06 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-GB; i386; ver 3.06.14.1445) X-Mailer: (Demonstration) PMMail (Alpha 1) 3.06.14.1445 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [OS2Wireless] Re: eCS Firewall X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:49:54 -0700 Bob wrote: > > >I ran grc.com and passed except for ping which responded. I will have to check >the firewall on my Verizon router to see if I can disable ping responses. I used to like grc but after a router upgrade I am not so sure. As I had to rewrite all the router firewall rules I used grc to check the results. From my laptop it said complete stealth. Good I thought. Just for fun I then checked it from my server. Complete stealth. Hmm, I have http, smtp and a couple of non standard ones open but grc on all ports or well known ports reported green across the board. Only by specifically checking the ports I *knew* were open did it say that. This is clearly impossible to do for every port. Now it may be something to do with what the grc website calls "adaptive" firewalls when the firewall sees lots of packets form the same source - but a) I see no logging to that effect, not sure actually if I would, or b) I would have thought that the smtp port would have been hit long before the firewall tumbled what was going on. -- Regards Dave Saville