From: "Thomas Dennis" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16)
  with ESMTP id 1951602 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:48:06 -0500
Received-SPF: none (secmgr-ny.randr: 194.25.134.19 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of t-online.de) client-ip=194.25.134.19; envelope-from=tdennis@t-online.de; helo=mailout06.t-online.de;
Received: from mailout06.t-online.de ([194.25.134.19])
	by (none) with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N9yB1-0007S8-VR
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:47:19 -0500
Received: from fwd02.aul.t-online.de 
	by mailout06.t-online.de with smtp 
	id 1N9xhX-0003qw-01; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:16:47 +0100
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (SgONIBZbYhi0wv-D5IZHTOgAHEUflXtLpIB-ppVuMnI9JeggBkm17pQBKmZeRhfZBs@[80.136.247.15]) by fwd02.t-online.de
	with esmtp id 1N9xg3-1ihFZ20; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:15:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4B011821.1090102@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:15:13 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: How secure is POTS?
References: <list-1951190@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1951190@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ID: SgONIBZbYhi0wv-D5IZHTOgAHEUflXtLpIB-ppVuMnI9JeggBkm17pQBKmZeRhfZBs
X-TOI-MSGID: 6f0f1c73-5fa9-4bb2-acef-71279bc76aaa
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: 	0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines

Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
> Before this thread grows legs of any greater length, and before I have 
> to deal with the inevitable surge of complaints from subscribers who 
> have signed up for this list *specifically* to discuss wireless 
> technology AS IT RELATES TO OS/2 and/or eCS, I am asking that it be 
> moved to a more appropriate forum. Perhaps something at 
> http://www.dslreports.com/forums/all might be a good fit.
>
> I *hate* doing stuff like this. These lists of mine are *supposed* to 
> be self-moderated, but *I* am the guy who has to field the inevitable 
> complaints.
>
> Sorry, and thanks.
>
To Lewis and all the others reading the mail:
Thank you for your patience.  I shall put an to my little
discourse.
And again thank you for your patience.

Thomas