From: "Lewis G Rosenthal" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (account lgrosenthal HELO [10.71.11.211]) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 2182709 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:53:23 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: SnapperMail 2.5.0.06 by Snapperfish To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Linksys Message-ID: <1243-SnapperMsg4EDDFFFDC78D2805@[10.71.11.211]> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:53:11 -0500 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Hi, guys... On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:37:16 -0700 "Norm Metcalf" wrote: >J R FOX wrote: >> I'm curious about something, after stopping recently at Fry's >> for other reasons. One of their salesmen was talking to another >> customer nearby, on the subject of networking gear, and said >> that Linksys was "circling the drain" quality wise, ever since >> Cisco took them over. One major basis for this -- he said -- >> was the rate of returns, and customer complaints about reliability. >> >> I've had to return three of their WRT54G routers because neither myself nor Linksys Tech Support could get them to install. On the other hand two of them worked fine right out of the box. Supposedly the WRT54GL is quite capable and has more features, plus being Linux compatible. > The WRT54GL is based on the earlier (classic) WRT54G. I have seen a marked decrease in overall quality of design & manufacture of other LinkSys devices, particularly unmanaged switches. For a while, my office was akin to a revolving door to LinkSys RMA services. Now, I either go Cisco (which, of course, is their intention) or to D-Link (for the small stuff). I first saw a decrease in the quality of the LinkSys firmware. The next thing was the first generation of LinkSys hardware, post-acquisition. So, about the only LinkSys hardware I recommend (and support) is the WRT54GL. ___ Lewis G Rosenthal Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC Sent with SnapperMail