From: "J R FOX" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2183329 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:28:53 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1NcKgM-0006O9-O0 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:28:53 -0500 Received: from web81408.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.136]:26293) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcKgK-0005Hh-0q for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:28:48 -0500 Received: (qmail 36153 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2010 15:28:46 -0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.4B6844B0.00F0,ss=1,fgs=0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pacbell.net; s=s1024; t=1265124526; bh=NQUmL7h5c3+DawmY8Rjb7OdS1irbrlK/22l1f28uYTw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Yjt/xGjY/PE40ULrndXseA3Jr+Sdqtu3BLIG9sqXdMvzqdSRWwLfNw3V3HTmvdNTGfDXDMj8tOWB8JF6TYOZe0vx/UzJXdmagAk/7IijNq1uZ39lbmUyGrVafh+rl405I4b3NW/jjhrtVbL92L3mVwy1TtW6Siu50LVKNoH773Y= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wLPh3OmN++9vkHva+yBpIPlIFRAVdLhaNjBywzlfYePNLt+ZwhnkFpdbTUG+FPE/aFwfQB9/zDgU56HvGW5i3QQDs6sYjBdVGsZkIJ4pHy6QuR9vM1oBGt2nLOf+AruqIjAY17P/vlqzxJMJRzVZZizb5BI3d8XtWFYxY/f1YxI=; Message-ID: <283543.34649.qm@web81408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: FA9kyNQVM1lm_oUQVs.10mCpdwPhgbT_9QWA9malJN7.PaKoTnZCmlXPTTOjtyFwSLUJ7JyqH7TE5t4UnBdbzl77ae7rhGvMuaP.9KjWmKm7pwuKJVjd5cFNmMf6TYoJ6hWRXgAwvOp9dsr4a3eglalcuKobTOrEYT0ZCLyZ98kGTY.iffxZ17RRaf1_sYk07rOlvGJYkTXKYnN65brLWxrJuy_2JYIyXOUcCLQC9umFWodKtThrih0ME9gH19cXWDykgBi7MomeGMEopIjdgyl53Sy5tXWVpWMZGqXbXq_LJcNzBWGtPoVKugfUECTY2R9Xtr0- Received: from [72.130.141.223] by web81408.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:28:45 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.1.10 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 07:28:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Linksys To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Lewis wrote: > I have seen a marked decrease in overall quality of design & > manufacture of other LinkSys devices, particularly unmanaged switches. > For a while, my office was akin to a revolving door to LinkSys RMA > services. Now, I either go Cisco (which, of course, is their > intention) orto D-Link (for the small stuff). > I first saw a decrease in the quality of the LinkSys firmware. > The nextthing was the first generation of LinkSys hardware, > post-acquisition. > So, about the only LinkSys hardware I recommend (and support) is > the WRT54GL Hmmm, so that fellow was on to something. I thought that might be the case. Then you do have some alternatives lined up for us in this area, should that prove to be necessary ? Often, as in the case of some Thinkpads, we seem to be welded to one or two options for something, due to a history of known OS/2 compatibility -- even if there are quite a few _other_ good products out there, which might be a lot better. (I'm not sure if that's the best example, since I've heard that many if not most contemporary laptops, like Fujitsus or Toshibas, can be made to run eCS, although one might have to modify them, or give up on some item like sound support. I've seen the odd Asus or Acer Aspire at a SCOUG meeting, and I think a Fujitsu model or two as well.) Jordan