From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2184341 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:57:43 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1NcbzQ-0008T1-K7 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:57:43 -0500 Received: from nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com ([61.9.189.137]:29672) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcbzK-0006qt-1E for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:57:34 -0500 Received: from nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com ([121.217.5.136]) by nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20100203095731.HDYB1821.nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:57:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.2] (really [121.217.5.136]) by nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20100203095730.PCPZ1743.nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.100.2]> for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:57:30 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.4B69488E.0152,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <4B6948B3.6090301@durrant.mine.nu> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:58:11 +1100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (OS/2/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Intel Wifi 5300 chipset supported ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com from [121.217.5.136] using ID edward.durrant@bigpond.com at Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:57:30 +0000 X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150201.4B69488B.002C,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Jan van Wijk wrote: > Hi Lewis, > > On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:42:11 -0500 Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > >> That said, you could always pull the 5300 card and replace it with a >> 4965AGN or a 3945AGN. >> >> I wish I had better news to report... >> > > Not a big problem yet :-) > > I need that system for cross-platform development, both for myself > (DFSee, QT4 version) as for other customers I do development for. > > So I will need to run Windows on it anyway, and can probably live > just fine with eCS in Virtual Box. The Lenovo W500 and W700 sound > ideal for that with their 1920x1200 screen . > (which may be a problem for eCs too). > > Alltough the W700 is a tad TOO big for my taste :-) > > Regards, JvW > > You may want to wait until March when the W500 will be replaced with the W510. -- Cheers/2 Ed eComStationAustralia podcast http://eComStationAustralia.podbean.com or iTunes