From: Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2223072 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:59:41 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1NhOtm-0003X3-0A for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:59:40 -0500 Received: from mx-02queue01.mts.net ([142.161.131.10]:3694) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhOtj-00006e-15 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:59:35 -0500 Received: from wnpgmb021pw-sp03.mts.net ([10.204.128.23]) by mx-02mtaout01.mts.net with ESMTP id <20100216145357.PDDZ3908.mx-02mtaout01.mts.net@wnpgmb021pw-sp03.mts.net> for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:53:57 -0600 Received: from brndmb02dc1-213-74.dynamic.mts.net (HELO smtp.mts.net) ([216.55.213.74]) by wnpgmb021pw-sp03.mts.net with SMTP; 16 Feb 2010 08:53:57 -0600 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.4B7AB2D7.021D,ss=1,fgs=0 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FABtAekvYN9VK/2dsb2JhbACZRIEAVXXCYwQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,484,1262584800"; d="scan'208";a="125877957" To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Post Road Mailer for OS/2 (Green Edition Ver 3.0) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:53:57 MST Reply-To: os24u@wisdomtree.info Subject: Re: cpu cool Message-Id: <20100216145357.PDDZ3908.mx-02mtaout01.mts.net@wnpgmb021pw-sp03.mts.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: 0.6 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.8 INFO_TLD URI: Contains an URL in the INFO top-level domain ** Reply to note from "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:13:01 -0500 > The system has now come back up a couple times. I've had to redo the CMOS settings, and later will compare them to a file I > saved somewhere detailing what they were. The one I'm least sure about right now is the CPU frequency, which can range from > 200 to 204. 200 seems to be the default, so I've left it there for now. The fans still seem noticeably quieter than they were, even > after I've put their CMOS setting back to 'Medium', which is where I thought they had been. Whether this will be sufficient, I > don't know, as I haven't run anything yet that stresses the system. > > Do systems of the last few years automatically shut themselves down, if they get too hot . . . or will they let everything fry ? I > thought I read something about a failsafe shutdown becoming standard ? > > I've now installed Speedfan, which may prove helpful here, once I learn how to use it. Do we have anything like this on the OS/2 > side ? > May try, all zips: tp-134 throttle 8233cool ControlYourFans_V2.0 I use throttle from cli. Suprising how little time cpu is actually needed at full speed. Cal http://www.wisdomtree.info Largest OS/2 applications and articles URL database