From: "chekmarx" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2293325 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:24:18 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1NusfB-0006gG-3q for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:24:18 -0400 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:27670) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nusf7-0001MN-25 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:24:13 -0400 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1610889qwi.39 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:24:12 -0700 (PDT) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.4BABB85D.0257,ss=1,fgs=0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UcK5rxcgbM0J4n7sXqSaQqhk089HrTLB23lYzJxxvJo=; b=AtcOjtpKepPK2UvtT4YybtUbT/fKICHChebmDi7aN/OdodjZ75VTE6WndCk81NELSD IiNFtz3xyOIUTKl1twT83kmXQ/25+vQ0r5T7JGFkIdRUE4ccoq4zE6lCjDmgVPZHybQn mXMeg/lTkXd9ucZlqpWiSJIHkLRrjNQydAIRc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sFDGyCDdfmpKfdCY/aTnSL13hpnjteWz+KLdLE935sNNpLtEtIFhJiOvkTe0CNGCHB +I/+KTYqvu6J4P3Rj2HSKRFZXo1HUS3FWJZyOuUj5uhOGxf6Lx4p3HUf9S9wrxbnpuXB /y9tyW7xqK5yGj9EbKIgUKRFQPOdFh6+zltnc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.14.157 with SMTP id g29mr36966qca.57.1269545052239; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:24:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:24:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Wireless router To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151757671cdd79720482a4fdfb --00151757671cdd79720482a4fdfb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Will Honea < os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> wrote: Just a thought for > you: those puny surge protector strips are very limited but (especially > for > phone lines) one at the point of entry cascaded with a second one several > feet > away near the actual equipment reduces the surge MUCH better than a single > point protection scheme. > Thanks Will for the info. I knew that the POS strips didn't do much to protect electronic gear but I didn't know a two-strip approach would be a better route to go. I need to get some sort of protection for my new system. I was hoping to get something that would simply plug into a two-gang receptacle, replacing the face-plate. Would you happen to have any suggestions for a quality piece? (Basically money is no longer an issue. I bought my system from Gene Alexander of EERAC Computers and want it to be protected!) TIA Greg > -- > Will Honea > --00151757671cdd79720482a4fdfb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Will Honea <os2= -wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> wrote:

<snip>
Just a thought fo= r
you: =A0those puny surge protector strips are very limited but (especially = for
phone lines) one at the point of entry cascaded with a second one several f= eet
away near the actual equipment reduces the surge MUCH better than a single<= br> point protection scheme.

Thanks Will for the info.= =A0 I knew that the POS strips didn't do much to protect electronic gea= r but I didn't know a two-strip approach would be a better route to go.= =A0 I need to get some sort of protection for my new system.=A0 I was hopin= g to get something that would simply plug into a two-gang receptacle, repla= cing the face-plate.

Would you happen to have any suggestions for a quality piece?
(Basic= ally money is no longer an issue.=A0=A0 I bought my system from Gene Alexan= der of EERAC Computers and want it to be protected!)

TIA
Greg
=A0
--
Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net&g= t;

--00151757671cdd79720482a4fdfb--