From: "Will Honea" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2293414 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:06:12 -0400 Received-SPF: pass (secmgr-ny.randr: domain of eigbox.net designates 66.96.185.11 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.96.185.11; envelope-from=SRS0=Yb3hFH=LF=whonea.net=whonea@eigbox.net; helo=bosmailout11.eigbox.net; Received: from bosmailout11.eigbox.net ([66.96.185.11]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NutJj-0007E6-Dc for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:06:12 -0400 Received: from bosmailscan02.eigbox.net ([10.20.15.2]) by bosmailout11.eigbox.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1NutJh-00012M-3f for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:06:09 -0400 Received: from bosimpout02.eigbox.net ([10.20.55.2]) by bosmailscan02.eigbox.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1NutJg-0006Q6-KE for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:06:08 -0400 Received: from bosauthsmtp07.eigbox.net ([10.20.18.7]) by bosimpout02.eigbox.net with NO UCE id xY681d00N099BUA01Y68AE; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:06:08 -0400 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.20.18.7 X-EN-IMPSID: xY681d00N099BUA01Y68AE Received: from 174-22-135-166.clsp.qwest.net ([174.22.135.166] helo=192.168.100.9) by bosauthsmtp07.eigbox.net with esmtpa (Exim) id 1NutJg-0005w7-DB for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:06:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:06:06 -0600 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Will Honea" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Wireless router MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25d; build=2006 X-Mailer-Platform: Linux; architecture=amd64; version=2.6.27.45-0.1-default X-Mailer-Java-VM: Sun Microsystems Inc.; version=1.6.0_18; compiler=null X-EN-UserInfo: b0192109012588bf2b05ebe482b26736:f259605ce5aa1fb891467026511a1cfb X-EN-AuthUser: whonea@whonea.net Sender: "Will Honea" X-EN-OrigIP: 174.22.135.166 X-EN-OrigHost: 174-22-135-166.clsp.qwest.net Message-ID: ** Reply to message from "chekmarx" on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:24:12 -0400 > Thanks Will for the info. I knew that the POS strips didn't do much to > protect electronic gear but I didn't know a two-strip approach would be a > better route to go. I need to get some sort of protection for my new > system. I was hoping to get something that would simply plug into a > two-gang receptacle, replacing the face-plate. > > Would you happen to have any suggestions for a quality piece? > (Basically money is no longer an issue. I bought my system from Gene > Alexander of EERAC Computers and want it to be protected!) I've got one like that which also expands the double receptacle to a 6 receptacle. It's labeled as being from PowerSystems but I have no idea how effective it is. I needed more sockets for all the crap we plug in when the wife is working at the kitchen table and figured that since I wanted a 6-way output I might as well get any protection I could from it. I don't know if they are still around but a few years back we were using PanaMax products for the monitoring and control equipment we produced. They included a protection circuit for phone lines as well a for the power line. We ran them through a bunch of lab tests and I really liked their design - they have a couple of hunking big toroidal coils ahead of the MOV's which really did a job on spikes. As for field tests, we got one back with the complaint that it "didn't work" anymore after a lightning strike on the water tower above the equipment shed. When I opened it up, I poured out a hand full of charred dust - the entire inside of the unit was destroyed. We replaced the unit, they plugged the computer and stuff back in and everything worked! Impressive. They weren't the cheapest around but they served us well. As I said, that was a few years back but I think they are still in business. -- Will Honea