From: "Rick R." Received: from mxout3.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.167] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 833650 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:15:17 -0500 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HGFTp-000A9d-1e for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:15:01 -0500 Received: from web61216.mail.yahoo.com ([209.73.179.50]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HGFTo-0006Kf-FY for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:15:00 -0500 Received: (qmail 56558 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Feb 2007 14:14:50 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=lQaj4Hg8XMGDxu6yrkxF0Tu1nJOZQDKgYyl7WFed71i0a9bKtAxpm46ue0hC4uIIUvXlD1/IxusBChqfhpijpjK8pcq649vIFROUSUnGC5yOWEX3GpWsHD5/GPofMPYGKA4WMTLxdVZ7M3RE4FYJK8UxrX9DaQPOOBMi+ud693I=; X-YMail-OSG: 5vFnkSQVM1mgLOgBPqBYj0.9BIAP7D3YfxRh4xRM5Mlg_1m58YzL9WLAvINuuQkYvtDtYSlktGGEfImZvkSf8_2Z0_u18mKMbbEQq.8O1CEP5iooV6Env9i5Z2F6KMTISAwOS86MPpUBRPk7P.0uBFFKlOAPVtkFv4Pmscb3hLRNxcg- Received: from [65.211.134.99] by web61216.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:14:49 PST Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:14:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Netlabs To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <969670.55993.qm@web61216.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 209.73.179.50 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) I think that's highly appropriate. Not just because running an eCS/OS/2 group on none-OS/2 systems would make the whole thing the laughing stock of the Internet, but also because Windoze servers are known to intentionally mess up none-Windoze systems by introducing just enough none-standard overhead into protocols to make all hell breal loose. --- Frank Vos wrote: > Hello Hakan, > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:48:00 -0500 (EST), Hakan > wrote: > > >Although off-topic, I am hoping someone here would > know the answer -- I > >am trying to get IRC at voyager.netlabs.org working > again after having > >been offline for a while. The channel can not be > found, does anyone > >know if they have moved? > I don't use IRC, so I don'know if this information > is useful. I read in the Netlabs newsletter the > following: > > From: Adrian Gschwend > Unfortunately the admin of the eCS Network refuses > to accept any servers in > the IRC network which are not running OS/2 so I am > not allowed to connect > to that network anymore. While I find that very > narrow-minded I have to > accept that and move the IRC network. In the next > days I will most probably > join another existing network and #netlabs will move > to that network as > well. I will announce that for sure. For now > irc.netlabs.org points to > irc.aroa.ch. I would have preferred to stay on eCS > Network because that's > where we belong... > > > Kind regards, > Frank > > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > This message is sent to you because you are > subscribed to > the mailing list > . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > > Send administrative queries to > > To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: > and reply to > the confirmation email. > > This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal > P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- > electronic communications related to content > contained in these messages should be directed > to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL