From: "Dave Saville" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2379239 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:58:32 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1O4f82-0001Og-Cn for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:58:31 -0400 Received: from mail.deezee.org.uk ([81.187.184.98]:49957) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4f80-0008Pg-0n for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:58:28 -0400 Received: from bearpaw.bear.den (bearpaw.bear.den [192.168.0.201]) by mail.deezee.org.uk (Weasel v1.805) for ; 21 Apr 2010 19:58:23 +0100 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020204.4BCF4AD4.026A,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <001.109203002a4acf4b.004@deezee.org> To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:55:38 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: References: Priority: Normal User-Agent: PMMail/3.07 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-GB; i386; ver 3.07.24.1523) X-Mailer: (Demonstration) PMMail (Beta 1) 3.07.24.1523 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] The OT "electrical protection" thread On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:25:44 -0600 Will Honea wrote: > >We had a few customers try collect on those insurance policies with mixed >results. The devil is in the details (the REALLY fine print). Reminded me of >filing claims against an auto insurer. Not related really, but in the late '90s we had a Sun 10,000 box when they were very new. Early one morning three well dressed guys with carryalls, we were next to an airport so not unusual, blagged their way into what they thought was an unmanned computer room. The lone operator saw them and ducked out the back and hit the panic button. When the boys in blue arrived said three were pulling boards out of the Sun. Unfortunately they had not switched it off............... Our insurance would not pay out because "nothing had been stolen" and Sun refused to maintain the machine on the grounds of "who the heck knows *what* might be damaged". -- Regards Dave Saville