From: "Stan Sidlov" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16)
  with ESMTP id 2597397 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:32:48 -0400
Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com)
	by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.43)
	id 1OfaWs-00037d-8M
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:32:47 -0400
Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:47397)
	by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sbsidlov@gmail.com>)
	id 1OfaWo-0004GK-36
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:32:43 -0400
Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so1370611qwh.33
        for <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.4C55939B.0048,ss=1,fgs=0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received
         :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=3ynFd9ZW1/KJGEQWc+0HWESCVlr28tu/UBRAxTs4W+0=;
        b=etASQ1pyOXRsPtwmnO09bUnPUklgW7f2+uVZCV+dD3YgvSqJnJZf0Azeb++97A6fnc
         vxcaa+Lhk4fSv0NbgHarnjPuDWBHkan2FxYDlqBPQnG8blti9hvVEAzsZGBFcCnGar4V
         hZxcUYRZn9MwsqNZYyu8nRPeeAyszdmP2unR4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=xIFNY+v9+DvaPwTHa+WrsA4nPOTRZxWAH81fbHLryyrrcDrD8Ijbq9AGSdoiHzXVmv
         O1XNJpE7nsO7VPu4sbqml4Uqeq+lWN9TsQRmO1NGiQE8ROIu/NiPCzYGO5uPlEYD5TsI
         VZEe42LKqF0xiM03/ME/gWSzfaHGHTtjduw4k=
Received: by 10.220.75.200 with SMTP id z8mr3221499vcj.197.1280676761338; Sun, 
	01 Aug 2010 08:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sbsidlov@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.71.9 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 08:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-2596896@2rosenthals.com>
References: <list-2596896@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:32:21 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3G4JnzDA7kTZg0UMjz6gVIzcBHM
Message-ID: <AANLkTikMqrf-uOYzVBKFLLnrFX0crmhd7Fk64EAzOxvu@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] miniPCI wireless card compatibility, older and 
	newer Thinkpads
To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64605a26e8a7d048cc4cb9f

--0016e64605a26e8a7d048cc4cb9f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Is there any 5Ghz wpa2 -aes support?

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Lewis G Rosenthal <
os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> wrote:

>
>>
>>
> Per Aron's comments, the W500 has a mini-PCI-Express slot and the T42 has a
> mini-PCI, which are different architectures. Look for an Intel 3945abg
> (8086:4227) or a 4965agn (8086:4229, or 8086:4230) card to replace the 5300
> in the W500. I have tested both of these with GenMAC with good results. The
> difference is really whether you need the 802.11n capability now or
> anticipate needing it in the future. I *believe* the 802.11b/g & 802.11a
> radios in both cards are about the same, at least in terms of performance
> (someone please correct me if my recollection is lacking). Also note that
> the 4965agn card supports *draft*-n, as it predates the ratification of the
> 802.11n standard. Thus, it may not be fully compatible with equipment which
> has been released more recently.
>
>

--0016e64605a26e8a7d048cc4cb9f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is there any 5Ghz wpa2 -aes support?=A0<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">O=
n Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Lewis G Rosenthal <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com">os2-wireless_users@2rose=
nthals.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
 =A0<br>
</blockquote>
Per Aron&#39;s comments, the W500 has a mini-PCI-Express slot and the T42 h=
as a mini-PCI, which are different architectures. Look for an Intel 3945abg=
 (8086:4227) or a 4965agn (8086:4229, or 8086:4230) card to replace the 530=
0 in the W500. I have tested both of these with GenMAC with good results. T=
he difference is really whether you need the 802.11n capability now or anti=
cipate needing it in the future. I *believe* the 802.11b/g &amp; 802.11a ra=
dios in both cards are about the same, at least in terms of performance (so=
meone please correct me if my recollection is lacking). Also note that the =
4965agn card supports *draft*-n, as it predates the ratification of the 802=
.11n standard. Thus, it may not be fully compatible with equipment which ha=
s been released more recently.<br>


<br></blockquote></div>

--0016e64605a26e8a7d048cc4cb9f--