|Poštni seznam arhiviranih sporo?il||Nazaj na seznam|
Hi Lewis,10MBs = 80Mbps, which is good, considering the transfer overhead. That said, when testing gigabit adapters, I've found that I really need to test them at gigabit widths (speeds, for those lurkers who think along those lines, though "speed" is more accurately a measurement of latency - or vice-versa). When Doug & I were futzing about with the Broadcom drivers, we tested via a gigabit switch as well as via CAT-6 crossover (which gives an indication of how much bandwidth is lost in switching overhead). We used netio, BTW.
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:21:12 -0400 Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
While none of this to this point is wireless-related, I'm still curious to know whether you have had a chance to run any benchmarks for network performance (say, netio) against the new driver?
No, never used NETIO.
However, in copying many gigabytes of data over from a T42, both attached through a 100Mbit switch, FileCommander showed
a throughput of just over 10 megabytes/second with large files.
That must be pretty close to saturation of the 100Mbit ...
Naro?iti: Poro?ilo (Feed),
E-pošta za mojstra za sezname