From: "Christian Langanke" Received: from mxout2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.166] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 872548 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:51:11 -0500 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HGi8T-000COl-S4 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:51:10 -0500 Received: from waldorf.webpack.hosteurope.de ([217.115.142.71]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HGi8T-000DOt-G3 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:50:53 -0500 Received: from p50848a65.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.132.138.101] helo=[172.32.16.110]); authenticated by waldorf.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM using esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) id 1HGi8N-00086b-Pu; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:50:47 +0100 Message-ID: <45D0D324.20807@clanganke.de> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:50:44 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (OS/2/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;cla@clanganke.de;1171313453;e2b7e056; X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 217.115.142.71 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Neil Waldhauer wrote: > This is off-topic, but I disagree with you and Rick and anyone else who thinks > the world is paying enough attention to think of us. > Neil, I very much disagree as well, I second your reason very much, and I see another one. Rules in general are nothing bad, (but beside personal taste and popular demands) they normally are intended to help achieving a meaningful goal. But for this os rule I doubt that it leads to a meaningful goal in our days, in fact today I consider it being counterproductive if it is about building and keeping the eCS community together (this may well have been different in 2002). The reason for this is that I think no service that promotes eCS should be disclosed from any offer of another eCS related service, as long as it serves the goal of promoting eCS. I would be happy to have thousand of linux boxes, or even MS doing eCS promotion on thousands of W2k3 boxes if they only would like to :-) IMHO promoting eCS should be the only criteria for letting users and services take part in an eCS related community and their offerings. And concerning that I would consider netlabs.org being at least one of the most valuable platforms around. I don't know a single website that has done that much for OS/2 and eComStation projects and with it application development as netlabs.org did in the last ten years. And I see _no single site_ that has done only a little part of the effort to keep the OS/2 & eCS idea running further in the future. Therefore I conclude: rules are good, but they sometimes have to be changed. Change this one, it is high time! bye, Christian ------------------------------------------------- Christian Langanke COS2E & CWSE Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V. cla@clanganke.de