From: "Kris Steenhaut" Received: from mxout3.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.167] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 884436 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:32:29 -0500 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HHyW1-0004Bh-O4 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:32:28 -0500 Received: from outmx018.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.4.117]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HHyW1-000DeD-FS for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:32:25 -0500 Received: from outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id l1G8WGog018830 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:32:16 +0100 (envelope-from ) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (22.88-240-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.240.88.22]) by outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id l1G8WD2V018794; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:32:13 +0100 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: <45D56BC3.4070200@kolibrieweg.eu> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:30:59 +0100 Organization: CFM$-FC (Coalition for Micro$oft-Free Computing) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Intel 3945 support in GenMAC References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 195.238.4.117 X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) Andy Willis ha scritto: >> If this is such common knowledge as your comments imply, why did I get >> the 'should not be a problem' responses when I asked about the T60 back >> in October, BEFORE I ordered the two systems. Sounds like great 20-20 >> hind sight. And, especially when the GenMac announcement EXPLICITLY >> says it DOES support the PRO/1000 [vendor:device match exactly]. > Hopefully I'll be able to do some tests in the next few weeks. I am > supposed to be getting a T60 (no idea what hardware will be in it) > that I can do a little testing with. I wonder why we are accosting ourself to the brand name "Thinkpad". There are other brands around which are less eCS unfriendly, so why wouldn't we expand our field of view? -- Groeten uit Gent, Kris