From: "Leon D. Zetekoff" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1701005 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:03:30 -0500 Received-SPF: none (secmgr-ny.randr: 64.111.148.240 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of backwoodswireless.net) client-ip=64.111.148.240; envelope-from=wa4zlw@backwoodswireless.net; helo=shana.; Received: from bngr-64-111-148-240-pppoe.dsl.bngr.epix.net ([64.111.148.240] helo=shana.) by secmgr-ny.randr with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOq6O-0002mJ-1d for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:02:56 -0500 Received: from Unknown ([10.161.51.110]) by shana. id 12243 ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:02:51 -0500 Message-ID: <12243.03.02.51.12.02.2008@shana.> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:02:34 -0500 Reply-To: wa4zlw@arrl.net Organization: BackWoods Wireless User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] VOT (very off-topic) References: <114717.00.05.01.12.02.2008@shana.> In-Reply-To: <114717.00.05.01.12.02.2008@shana.> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090402030505070501070001" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090402030505070501070001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark...you can't ground the coax if you're using it for the phones. You really should be using twisted pair. Leon * Mark Henigan wrote, On 2/12/2008 12:03 AM: > Will Honea wrote: >> ** Reply to message from "Mark Henigan" >> on >> Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:29:27 -0800 >> >> >> >>> I think I need to describe the situation a little >>> more clearly, given your reply and several others. >> >> >> Not to beat a dead horse, Mark, but are you SURE that the phone >> company only >> ran two wires? Virtually every piece of their wiring I've looked at >> is at >> least 4-wire (2 pairs) and most, if not all, the whoie house >> installations wre >> either 4 or 8 pair bundles in a continuous loop from the service >> entrance >> around the building back to service entrance. They may have gotten >> really >> cheap in the last few years, but I would still bet on at least 4 >> wires - a lot >> of their extra service oprions require 2 pairs, so that's what they >> use. Be >> worth a littel more investiagtion - you may have everything you need >> already, >> especially if the house is more that 5-6 years old. > > Hello Will: > > I haven't seen more than two wires per line > in years in residential installations; and, > that is all they gave me. I made a couple > of primitive adapters with a little heat- > shrinkable tubing to cover the majority of > the length of the four wires that run with > the foil shield on some coax I salvaged. I > also covered the point where the main > plastic insulation was cut to inhibit the > passage of moisture (trivially). I have a > large spool of high quality coax that I > could have used. But, I let my "waste not, > want not" tendencies to take over. I > installed it with a little stretching at > one end due to underestimating the distance > between terminal screws. I also forgot to > get a grounding F-F pass-through connector. > I'll get one and install it by this weekend, > so long as there is no significant current > to ground, something I'll check before > making the connection. > > The connection is marred by intermittent > crackling static that is never loud enough > to interfere with conversation and will > likely disappear after I ground the coax. > It's no worse than many of the lines I've > used in businesses. The amplitude/volume > is good. > > After some thought, I concluded that the > ring tone was unlikely to cause any > problems based on its voltage because it > is both brief and intermittent, and is > probably at a low enough current to not > heat the wire of the coax. After all, > the wire used in telephone connections is > tiny. > > I think it's going to be fine, despite its > theoretical inadequacies. > > Thanks for your thoughts and your > experience from a time when things weren't > being done quite as cheaply. > > - Mark > > Mark Henigan -- *Leon Zetekoff* Proprietor *Work:* 484-335-9920 *Mobile:* 610-223-8642 *Fax:* 484-335-9921 *Email:* wa4zlw@arrl.net *http://www.linkedin.com/in/leonzetekoff* *BackWoods Wireless* 505 B Main Street Blandon, PA 19510 "Bringing Broadband Technology to Rural Areas" See who we know in common Want a signature like this? --------------090402030505070501070001 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="wa4zlw.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="wa4zlw.vcf" begin:vcard fn:Leon Zetekoff n:Zetekoff;Leon org:BackWoods Wireless adr;dom:;;505 B Main Street;Blandon;PA;19510 email;internet:wa4zlw@arrl.net title:Owner tel;work:484-335-9920 tel;fax:484-335-9921 tel;home:610-916-0230 tel;cell:610-223-8642 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.backwoodswireless.net version:2.1 end:vcard --------------090402030505070501070001--