From: "John Poltorak" Received: from mxout1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.165] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 270807 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:47:24 -0400 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1G9AJx-000NQW-7E for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:47:17 -0400 Received: from 213-152-37-93.dsl.eclipse.net.uk ([213.152.37.93] helo=mail.warpix.org) by mxin2.mailhop.org with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1G9AJr-000IU4-Lr for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:47:11 -0400 Received: from tp600.warpix.org by mail.warpix.org (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 2.03/2.0) id BAA582.10; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 01:47:12 +0100 Received: by tp600.warpix.org (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 2.03/2.0) id BAA000.75; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 01:47:03 +0100 Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 01:47:02 +0100 To: Lewis G Rosenthal Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]OT: Resources (was: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: PCMCIA help) Message-ID: <20060805014702.C46@warpix.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.15i In-Reply-To: ; from Lewis G Rosenthal on Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:02:44AM -0400 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:02:44AM -0400, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > On 08/04/06 05:09 am, John Poltorak thus wrote : > Most of Warptech's problem is that I haven't had the time to really > promote it. I wanted it to serve as a development portal and information > exchange, not for the casual user, but for those of us in the trenches, > supporting multiple stations for clients (or our own larger networks) > and for developers looking for ideas and references. I wanted to migrate > this list there, as well, because I wanted a good portion of Warptech to > involve networking issues, and even started the wireless FAQ there. Of > course, Jonas was hard at work expanding the wireless section of > os2warp.be, and he did a fantastic job of it. I suppose I should have > provided more feedback and support for him instead of moving off in my > own direction. > > The point you raise about a single, authoritative resource is a good > one, though. We really do need such a thing which is updated on a > regular basis and has reasonable activity for discussion. I've surely > open to suggestions. I have quite a job trying to resolve various networking issues. One area which I've been unable to get any help is remote booting which I'm very much interested in but hardly anyone seems to know anything about it. It offers the option of being able to boot lots of different OS's on a system without the need to install them I have lots of other obscure problems involving networking which I'm sure other people must have answers to, but it is difficult to find them especially as there are so few people left using OS/2. > -- > Lewis -- John