OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Well I checked for that value and that's not it.
But thanks for the good info, it might help otherwise.
--- Roderick Klein
<os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:50:35 +0100 (BST), Dave
> Saville wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:15:16 -0400, Lewis G
> Rosenthal wrote:
> >
> >>On 08/04/06 06:41 am, Roderick Klein thus wrote :
> >>> I have not realy followed this thread but the
> stack of OS/2 is not that bad.
> >>> You get traps in sockets.sys ?
> >>>
> >>> Have you the the file \mptn\etc\inetcfg.ini ?
> >>> At last line does it have the line
> >>> SACK 1 0 0 1
> >>> Change the first 0 into a one.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Good point, Roderick. I forgot all about that tip.
> >
> >Which means and does what? I hate it when the fix
> is "change x to y" with no
> >explanation.
>
> I mean change the first 1 into a zero.
> This file was distributed on eCS 1.1 CD #2 "TCP/IP
> tuner.
> SACK stands for Selective acknowlegdement.
> It should make TCP/IP communication more efficient.
> However duo to a bug in the OS/2 TCP/IP stack this
> option results in
> the IP stack eating up more and more resources
> until the machine has no more kernel resources.
>
> Roderick Klein
>
>
>
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> This message is sent to you because you are
> subscribed to
> the mailing list
> <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to:
> <os2-wireless_users-off@2rosenthals.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
> <os2-wireless_users-digest@2rosenthals.com>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to
> <os2-wireless_users-index@2rosenthals.com>
> Send administrative queries to
> <os2-wireless_users-request@2rosenthals.com>
> To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to:
> <os2-wireless_users-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to
> the confirmation email.
>
> This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
> P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
> electronic communications related to content
> contained in these messages should be directed
> to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
back to list