From: "Cliff Scott" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 1984612 for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:36:03 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.randr ([192.168.200.201] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by (none) with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1NIk7c-0005hz-T0 for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:36:03 -0500 Received: from smtp9.trip.net ([216.139.64.9]:56102) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NIk7V-0001Uk-0c for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:35:53 -0500 Received: from RC7A (node32.13.251.72.1dial.com [72.251.13.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp9.trip.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBAEKsGe006794 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:20:55 -0600 (CST) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020207.4B210749.00CC:SCFSTAT9935096,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-Id: <200912101420.nBAEKsGe006794@smtp9.trip.net> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:20:53 -0600 To: "Virtualized eCS Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Cliff Scott" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [Virtualized eCS] TAP driver killing TCP/IP bandwidth MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25d; build=2006 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ ** Reply to message from "Andy Willis" on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:09:33 -0700 > Cliff Scott wrote: > > ** Reply to message from "Lewis G Rosenthal" > > on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:01:33 -0500 > > > >> Has anyone else seen this type of performance hit caused by the TAP driver? > > > > I don't know if this qualifies as a performance hit, but with the TAP driver > > my entire external network goes dead. I've spent many hours trying all kinds > > of stuff and finally gave up. I also have a Broadcom B57 nic, but am using > > the native driver. > > > You don't have it tied to a wireless as well do you? If I connect to > wireless it knocks out my whole network, wired and wireless. > Andy No. Just a 100 mb peer ethernet. -- Cliff eCS 2.0RC7