From: "Cliff Scott" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 1984615 for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:37:23 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by (none) with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1NIk8u-0005k2-Kv for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:37:23 -0500 Received: from smtp9.trip.net ([216.139.64.9]:56102) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NIk8j-0001Uk-0q for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:37:09 -0500 Received: from RC7A (node32.13.251.72.1dial.com [72.251.13.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp9.trip.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBAEKlro006790 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:20:48 -0600 (CST) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.4B210795.00CE:SCFSTAT9935096,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-Id: <200912101420.nBAEKlro006790@smtp9.trip.net> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:20:46 -0600 To: "Virtualized eCS Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Cliff Scott" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [Virtualized eCS] TAP driver killing TCP/IP bandwidth MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25d; build=2006 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ ** Reply to message from "Lewis G Rosenthal" on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:22:03 -0500 > Hi, Cliff... > > On 12/09/09 10:43 pm, Cliff Scott thus wrote : > > ** Reply to message from "Lewis G Rosenthal" > > on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:01:33 -0500 > > > > > >> Has anyone else seen this type of performance hit caused by the TAP driver? > >> > > > > I don't know if this qualifies as a performance hit, but with the TAP driver > > my entire external network goes dead. I've spent many hours trying all kinds > > of stuff and finally gave up. I also have a Broadcom B57 nic, but am using > > the native driver. > > > > > That sounds like it might be related, considering the falloff in > bandwidth I saw with the native driver vs GenMAC. If you feel like > giving it a whirl, see if the GenMAC driver at least gets you out to the > net. As I said before, I wasn't even aware of just how bogged my > performance was until I tested it. Most of my LAN file transfers go over > IPX, which has *always* outperformed TCP for me (when writing to NetWare > volumes, at least; I really don't do much FTP-over-LAN, and no peer > transfers at all). > > Cheers/2, and thanks for following up, Cliff. Lewis, I've tried the use Genmac in the past and it doesn't recognize my card. I submitted the details from PCI sniff and as of the last time I tried it still wouldn't recognize it. Maybe I should try again since it's been a while since I tried. -- Cliff eCS 2.0RC7